Streamlining the Fat: A Systematic Review of Active Closed Wash and Filtration in Autologous Fat Grafting After Breast Reconstruction.

Although fat grafting in breast reconstruction continues to grow in popularity, the optimal technique remains elusive and outcomes are varied. This systematic review of available controlled studies utilizing active closed wash and filtration (ACWF) systems sought to examine differences in fat processing efficiency, aesthetic outcomes, and revision rates. A literature search was performed from inception to February 2022 following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) in Ovid MEDLINE (Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands), Ovid Embase (Wolters Kluwer), and Cochrane Library (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ). Two independent reviewers screened the studies for eligibility with Covidence software. Bibliographies and citing references from selected articles were screened from Scopus (Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands). The search identified 3476 citations, with 6 studies included. Three studies demonstrated a significantly higher volume of graftable fat harvested in a significantly lower mean grafting time with ACWF than with their respective controls. With respect to adverse events, 3 studies reported significantly lower incidences of nodule or cyst formation with ACWF with respect to control. Two studies reported a significantly lower incidence of fat necrosis with ACWF vs control, with this trend upheld in 2 additional studies. Three studies reported significantly lower revision rates with ACWF with respect to control. No study reported inferiority with ACWF for any outcome of interest. These data suggest that ACWF systems yield higher fat volumes in less time than other common techniques, with decreased rates of suboptimal outcomes and revisions, thereby supporting active filtration as a safe and efficacious means of fat processing that may reduce operative times. Further large-scale, randomized trials are needed to definitively demonstrate the above trends.

Umbilical Complications following DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction: Demonstrating the Added Benefit of Preoperative Imaging.

BACKGROUND: Despite the umbilicus being an essential aesthetic unit, current literature on umbilical outcomes following abdominally based breast reconstruction is limited. In this study, the authors aim to elucidate the incidence and predictors of umbilical complications following deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps, with a particular emphasis on past abdominal surgery by type and measures that can be obtained easily from preoperative imaging. METHODS: An institutional review board-approved retrospective review of 258 patients who underwent DIEP flap reconstruction from 2011 through 2020 was performed. Patient demographics, preoperative laboratory studies, and intraoperative factors were appraised. Preoperative computed tomographic angiography or magnetic resonance angiography was used to measure umbilical stalk height (SH), abdominal wall thickness (AWT), and total fascial diastasis. Patients with and without perfusion-related umbilical complications were compared. RESULTS: Forty patients (15.5%) developed umbilical complications, including 20 patients with epidermolysis or scab, 12 with dehiscence, and 14 with partial necrosis. Patients with complications had a significantly higher rate of hypertension, previous abdominal midline incision, more lateral perforators per flap, longer umbilical stalk, and larger SH/AWT ratio ( P < 0.05). Logistic regression revealed that SH ( P = 0.006) and SH/AWT ratio ( P < 0.001) were the only significant predictors, with the latter having a greater area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (area under the curve, 0.79; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Radiographic measurements of umbilical SH and SH/AWT ratio reliably predict the occurrence of umbilical complications, with the ratio having a more robust predictive ability. The authors propose the use of routine preoperative imaging to identify high-risk patients who may benefit from prophylactic measures. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Does the Type of Reconstruction Matter? A Propensity Score Analysis of Immediate Postmastectomy Implant and Flap Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: No randomized controlled trials have compared implant and flap reconstruction. Recently, worse longitudinal outcomes have been suggested for flap reconstruction. The authors compared long-term oncologic outcomes of postmastectomy breast reconstruction using propensity score matching. METHODS: A retrospective study of postmastectomy reconstruction was achieved using the Weill Cornell Breast Cancer Registry between 1998 and 2019. Patients were matched using propensity scores based on demographic, clinical, and surgical characteristics. Kaplan-Meier estimates, Cox-regression models, and restricted mean survival times (RMST) were used to evaluate patient outcomes. RESULTS: Before matching, 1395 implant and 586 flap patients were analyzed. No difference in overall survival and recurrence were observed. Multivariable models showed decreased survival for Medicare/Medicaid [hazard ratio (HR), 3.09; 95% CI, 1.63 to 5.87; P < 0.001], pathologic stage II (HR, 2.98; 95% CI, 1.12 to 7.90; P = 0.028), stage III (HR, 4.88; 95% CI, 1.54 to 15.5; P = 0.007), 11 to 20 lymph nodes positive (HR, 3.66; 95% CI, 1.31 to 10.2; P = 0.013), more than 20 lymph nodes positive (HR, 6.41; 95% CI, 1.49 to 27.6; P = 0.013). RMST at 10 years after flap reconstruction showed 2 months of decreased survival time compared with implants (9.56 versus 9.74 years; 95% CI, -0.339 to -0.024; P = 0.024). After matching, 563 implant and 563 flap patients were compared. Reconstruction was not associated with overall survival and recurrence. RMST between implant and flap reconstruction showed no difference in each 5-year interval over 20 years. CONCLUSION: Postmastectomy breast reconstruction was not associated with a difference in long-term oncologic outcomes over a 20-year period. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

The Effect of Presurgical and Postsurgical Topical Tacrolimus on Pedicled Flap Survival in Rats: A Pilot Study.

PURPOSE: Our previous rodent studies demonstrated significantly decreased full-thickness necrosis in pedicled dorsal skin flaps with topical tacrolimus as compared with petroleum jelly. Histologically, we found that topical tacrolimus was correlated with increased vascular growth in areas more susceptible to ischemic damage. The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential benefits of pretreatment with tacrolimus. By applying tacrolimus in advance of raising the dorsal skin flaps, we hoped to increase vascularity and thus increase the overall viability of the flaps. METHODS: Twenty Sprague-Dawley rats were initially randomized to 4 groups based on timing of tacrolimus treatment (presurgical/postsurgical treatment): control/control (C/C), control/tacrolimus (C/T), tacrolimus/control (T/C), and tacrolimus/tacrolimus (T/T). Treatments consisted of 0.2 g of the control (topical petroleum jelly) and 0.1% topical tacrolimus to the rat dorsum twice per day. After 7 days of presurgical treatment, a cranially based dorsal skin flap measuring 3 × 10 cm was created. Two rats perished during surgery and were excluded for further analysis. Each rat was treated for a further 7 days and sacrificed. Two blinded reviewers marked the total skin flap area as well as areas of viable tissue, reversible ischemia, and full-thickness necrosis. Percentage areas were calculated using Fiji/ImageJ, and statistical analysis was performed in R. RESULTS: The average viable areas for C/C, C/T, T/C, and T/T were 31.4%, 31.9%, 35.6%, and 22.6%, respectively. The average reversible ischemic area for C/C, C/T, T/C, and T/T was 53.1%, 54.0%, 54.1%, and 71.5%, respectively. The average necrotic area for C/C, C/T, T/C, and T/T was 15.4%, 14.0%, 10.2%, and 5.9%, respectively. For areas of reversible ischemia, T/T arm had higher areas compared with C/T (P = 0.004) and T/C (P = 0.044). There was no significance between treatment arms for areas of viable and necrotic tissue. CONCLUSIONS: We observed higher areas of reversible ischemia for continuous tacrolimus treatment compared with only pre-tacrolimus application or post-tacrolimus application. This suggests that tacrolimus application before and after surgical insult may be associated with improved ischemic survival of the skin. Although we did not observe decreased areas of necrosis for tacrolimus treatment compared with control, this was likely due to the limited number of rats available in each arm to reach significance. Further study is needed to fully elucidate the encouraging trends that were observed.

Prevalence of Cognitive Impairment and Association With Survival Among Older Patients With Hematologic Cancers.

Importance: As the population ages, cognitive impairment has promised to become increasingly common among patients with cancer. Little is known about how specific domains of cognitive impairment may be associated with survival among older patients with hematologic cancers. Objective: To determine the prevalence of domain-specific cognitive impairment and its association with overall survival among older patients with blood cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective observational cohort study included all patients 75 years and older who presented for initial consultation in the leukemia, myeloma, or lymphoma clinics of a large tertiary hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, from February 1, 2015, to March 31, 2017. Patients underwent screening for frailty and cognitive dysfunction and were followed up for survival. Exposures: The Clock-in-the-Box (CIB) test was used to screen for executive dysfunction. A 5-word delayed recall test was used to screen for impairment in working memory. The Fried frailty phenotype and Rockwood cumulative deficit model of frailty were also assessed to characterize participants as robust, prefrail, or frail. Results: Among 420 consecutive patients approached, 360 (85.7%) agreed to undergo frailty assessment (232 men [64.4%] and 128 women [35.6%]; mean [SD] age, 79.8 [3.9] years), and 341 of those (94.7%) completed both cognitive screening tests. One hundred twenty-seven patients (35.3%) had probable executive dysfunction on the CIB, and 62 (17.2%) had probable impairment in working memory on the 5-word delayed recall. Impairment in either domain was modestly correlated with the Fried frailty phenotype (CIB, ρ = 0.177; delayed recall, ρ = 0.170; P = .01 for both), and many phenotypically robust patients also had probable cognitive impairment (24 of 104 [23.1%] on CIB and 9 of 104 [8.7%] on delayed recall). Patients with impaired working memory had worse median survival (10.9 [SD, 12.9] vs 12.2 [SD, 14.7] months; log-rank P < .001), including when stratified by indolent cancer (log-rank P = .01) and aggressive cancer (P < .001) and in multivariate analysis when adjusting for age, comorbidities, and disease aggressiveness (odds ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.13-0.50). Impaired working memory was also associated with worse survival for those undergoing intensive treatment (log-rank P < .001). Executive dysfunction was associated with worse survival only among patients who underwent intensive treatment (log-rank P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: These data suggest that domains of cognitive dysfunction may be prevalent in older patients with blood cancer and may have differential predictive value for survival. Targeted interventions are needed for this vulnerable patient population.